So it's being reported.
GENEVA (AFP) — The UN Human Rights Council was due to hold Friday a special session on the conflict in Gaza Strip to examine a motion by Egypt, Pakistan and Cuba seeking condemnation of the Israeli offensive and of "grave" violations.
The three countries, backed by members of the Arab League, Organisation of Islamic Conference, non-aligned and African states, gained the support of 32 of the 47 Council members for the special debate, twice as much as required.
An unofficial copy of the draft resolution expected to be presented to the world body's rights assembly called for "international action to put an end to grave violations by the occupying power, Israel, in the occupied Palestinian Territory, particularly in the occupied Gaza Strip.
It also demanded an immediate end to the military operation and that Israel "stop the targeting of civilians".
The session comes on the heels of the near unanimous approval on Thursday by the 15-member UN Security Council to a resolution calling for an "immediate, durable" ceasefire leading to the "full withdrawal" of Israeli forces.
The text also "calls for the unimpeded provision and distribution throughout Gaza of humanitarian assistance, including of food, fuel and medical treatment" and welcomes initiatives aimed at "creating and opening humanitarian corridors and other mechanisms for the sustained delivery of humanitarian aid."
It was unclear what impact the Security Council resolution would have on the Human Rights Council text.
Traditionally the Human Rights Council takes its decisions by consensus, but the current proposals for a resolution were regarded as one-sided, diplomats in Geneva indicated.
The text does not mention rocket attacks by Hamas militia on Israel, a key requirement for European Union and some Latin American countries in the assembly.
The session beginning at 11 am (1000 GMT) is expected to spill over into Monday after a weekend break because of the degree of interest from member states and observers including several leading human rights organisations, sources close to the UN rights body said.
Israel is not a member of the Human Rights Council, but has the rights to take part in the debate as an interested party.
Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riad Maliki was expected to attend the meeting.
A senior Israeli official Amos Gilad was in Cairo on Thursday for crucial talks on an Egyptian proposal for a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. But some Palestinian groups including Hamas, described the proposal as "not valid".
Also on Thursday, he international Red Cross accused the Israeli military standing by and failing to help wounded people in an area of Gaza, while a UN relief agency suspended its operations in the territory halted after a UN-flagged truck convoy was attacked
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
"An unofficial copy of the draft resolution expected to be presented to the world body's rights assembly called for "international action to put an end to grave violations by the occupying power, Israel, in the occupied Palestinian Territory, particularly in the occupied Gaza Strip."
If the UN thinks a war will stop just because they held a vote then why don't they vote on stopping the war in Sudan where muslims are killing thousands of non-muslims daily? Why dont they just make a vote to stop all crime all over the world? Just another example on how the UN panders to the arab nations.
Post a Comment