The purpose of this? To soften up more Liberal votes to go to the NDP. One problem. Most that read Steve's blog are Conservatives and not Liberals. Then again, CBC will probably pick up his story again and then everyone will be reading his blog.
This, of course, isn't the first time the Conservatives have run the NDP campaign. Here's a Mea Culpa from an NDP campaign manager on the last two elections:
For quick reference, Bart Maves was the sitting MPP and Rob Nicholson is the current Justice Minister of Canada
It may come as a surprise to some Liberals, but some New Democrats will admit it too.
Let me give you a good example of how Tory-NDP co-operation helped sink the Liberals in Niagara Falls.
In the 2003 provincial election, when it looked like the local Conservative campaign was going down with the ship, Bart Maves’ people sent the NDP campaign a list of voters who were identified as not supporting the Conservatives. The idea was that the NDP, with very few resources or volunteers, could more easily identify their supporters that way and hopefully, swing a few Liberal votes away from Kim Craitor’s campaign. The last minute Tory strategy failed and the Liberals won the riding.
I wasn’t involved in the 2003 campaign. However, less than a year later, while co-managing the Federal NDP’s campaign in Niagara Falls, we were able to rely on those 2003 Tory lists to build and, more importantly, broaden our base of support. In fact, we relied exclusively on those lists in that campaign and the NDP vote shot up to over 20% on election day and we quadrupled our vote total from the previous election. The Liberals lost a seat they had held since 1993 by fewer than 2000 votes to the Tories.
In 2006, I once again managed the NDP campaign in Niagara Falls. This time we had our own lists left over from 2004 and had more resources than ever before. Our advertising focused almost exclusively on attacking the Liberals despite the fact that it was now a Tory riding. We took this approach because we understood that the Liberals were in decline and our best opportunity for building our vote total came from disgruntled Liberals, not committed Conservatives. We attacked the Tories when it was convenient, but the Liberal record was our major focus.
Our efforts paid off. In fact, on election day we took over 12,000 votes, a record for the federal NDP in Niagara Falls. In debates, in the newspaper coverage, and in our election ads, we took direct aim at the Liberals, sometimes with the help of Rob Nicholson’s campaign. When Paul Martin was visiting the riding towards the end of the campaign to make an announcement about the development of a “heroes fund”, Tory MP Rob Nicholson personally contacted our campaign reminding us that this was originally an NDP proposal turned down by the Liberals. He left his personal cell phone number, said he was happy to help and encouraged us to contact him in case we couldn’t get research help from our own central campaign. Let's just say the Tory war room is faster. With Nicholson’s assistance, we were able to develop a targeted leaflet which exposed the Liberal flip flop and embarrassed the Liberal campaign. Nicholson also personally visited the NDP office and we were in contact with his office over advertising issues, successfully lobbying the Tories to pull a newspaper ad which the NDP candidate thought might hurt our campaign.
Is it any coincidence then that the NDP followed the Conservatives around the country for the first two or three weekd of the campaign? I'm just saying.
3 comments:
Not a shock that NDP'ers don't like Liberals, we are the same as Tories in their eyes in term of policies (and people like Paul Martin prove them right at times), but since they think we lie and steal left wing votes most Dippers find us the greater evil.
For the NDP to ever win government they need to kill the Liberal party like they have done in Manitoba, Sask, Nova Scotia and in a way in B.C since Campbell's party is a strange mix of Social Credit, Tories and Liberals.
I do not think that it is wrong for two differing parties to working together... isn't' that why we have more then one party?
Both have different viewpoint on fixing the same problems.
Together they create solutions that more Canadians benefit from and can agree on.
Even though I lean right, I am still open to hearing the ideas and opinions of the left. Often they will bring up valid points that I may not have thought about, or that I've overlooked.
By incorporating points from both sides of the political spectrum into one solutions, you create answers that are more beneficial and speak to a much broader range of Canadian viewpoints.
I find this approach creates a better give-and-take system, i.e., I will concede this, if you give me that.
The outcome tends to speak more directly to the people's concerns, regardless of their political philosophies.
I would take this sort of solution any day over policies that are created in an attempt to be neutral; offering a middle of the road answer.
Middle-of-the-road approaches often creates policies that do not appeal to anyone; I am not happy with any points. None of them directly addresses my problems; I must make a compromise on all of my values, rather then some.
You can't be everything to everybody.
Again I don't understand why it is wrong for differing parties to work together. Canadian politics should not be about partisanism, it should be about creating the best solutions.
The NDP and Tories openly working together... pity that that press hasn't seemed to pick up on it.
(Then again, the nitty-gritty of local campaigning isn't something the national press generally pays attention to.)
Post a Comment